"Success is a state of mind. If you want success, start thinking of yourself as a success." -Dr. Joyce Brothers
moneyMami

Can Michelle Obama’s Mamiverse Chat Win the Latino Vote?

Can Michelle Obama’s Mamiverse Chat Win the Latino Vote?First Lady Michelle Obama’s historic live chat with Latina moms, which I moderated in July, received rave reviews and still has the Latino community buzzing.  The Latina moms who participated—Melanie Edwards, Yvette Marquez-Shrapnack, Monica Olivera, and Shirley Rodriguez—are Mamiverse contributors with a passion for a myriad of issues including healthy eating, education, health care, home schooling, and more. The chat lasted half an hour and it went by in the blink of an eye. As the presidential election nears, Latino voters are still left with numerous questions; I’d like to take this opportunity to fill in some of the blanks.

The event was, in my view, a masterful political stroke by the Obama campaign.  In thirty minutes the Obamas demonstrated they understood just how important the voices of Latina mothers are going to be this election cycle.  As I mentioned during the chat, “as the ‘deciders’ in our Latino households, it will be us moms that have a big say in who the next president of the United States is going to be.”  By reaching out proactively to Mamiverse to start the conversation, the Obama team demonstrated their political savvy when it comes to this important demographic within an important demographic.

There was plenty of high praise about the historic nature of the chat; the political importance of the optics of the event, and the easy dynamic of the group. All the Latina moms were real, down-to-earth mamis with valid concerns they wanted to share with the First Lady. By the end, all felt the First Lady had been sincere and had made them feel at home. A strong case had been made as for why President Obama needs to be re-elected for the sake of a better future for their children.  But there were some questions, too; concerns regarding the lack of depth in the conversation, and the lack of talk of real solutions to the real economic problems facing Latinos, such as a high unemployment rate and the lack of comprehensive immigration reform.

Can Michelle Obama’s Mamiverse Chat Win the Latino Vote?Yet, part of what made this event so successful was that it was a naturally flowing, unscripted conversation about what matters on a daily basis to real Latina moms.  It was also a historic opportunity to have their voices heard directly by the First Lady and by extension, the President of the United States.  Mrs. Obama was very engaged, talked to us about her concern for her kids, how she thinks about the kind of world she wants to leave for them, and what opportunities all of America’s kids will have.  Any mom out there will tell you, regardless of political affiliation, that is exactly what drives our every move.

Off camera, she also talked about how many times she tells her girls to remember to say please and thank you, and to brush their teeth—to which ALL of us nodded in agreement!

While some may see this as fluff, the power of being heard, of experiencing a personal connection with someone in Mrs. Obama’s position cannot be underestimated. Republicans used to understand this very well as evidenced by George W. Bush’s savvy outreach to Hispanics.  He knew that for Latinos, familiarity is key.  Mrs. Obama made us all feel like we were part of her familia, and that is essential to gaining, growing and maintaining political support among Latinos.

That is more important now for President Obama than ever before.  In this tight election, he cannot afford to lose any ground with Latinos.  He won 67% of the Latino vote in 2008 and is on track to gain the same amount if not more.  In fact, a newly released Latino Decisions poll has President Obama leading Romney 70% to 22%.  Not a good place for a GOP presidential candidate who will need at least 40% of the Latino vote to win the White House.

It hasn’t all been rosy for President Obama.  There is no question there has been disappointment among Latinos that President Obama was not able to achieve comprehensive immigration reform like he promised. There has also been much anger that he has presided over record deportations of Latinos.  But the majority of Latinos understand two things:

1. Obama faced an obstructionist Republican congress that turned its back on any kind of immigration reform because it would anger conservatives; and

2. The existence of damaging right-wing voices in the GOP hostile to Latinos (Arizona’s SB1070 law, Romney’s “self-deport” commentsRep. Steve King’s remarks comparing immigrants to dogs, and GOP Kansas State Rep Virgil Peck’s remarks on fixing immigration by shooting immigrants from helicopters like feral pigs), and not one GOP leader who has strongly condemned such voices.  Some Republicans now, including former Governor Jeb Bush and Senator Marco Rubio, warn their own party they must change their tune.

More importantly, what has helped President Obama with Latinos are the actual policies he has put in place that have helped Latino families:

  • Extensions of the Earned Income Tax Credit, the Child Tax Credit and Unemployment Benefits help 5.4 million Latino families including 11.3 million Latino children, and nearly one million Hispanics who didn’t lose their unemployment benefits.
  • Facing the ‘Party of NO,’ President Obama has given temporary relief to almost one million ‘DREAMers’—undocumented kids who came here through no fault of their own and know no other country to call home.  They will be able to study or join the military without the threat of deportation.

Is this enough to ensure Latinos will come out to vote for President Obama?  I think so, but we will know for sure in November.  One thing is for certain though: Michelle Obama—in half an hour—empowered some powerful Latina mothers to engage their families, friends, and influential networks to be advocates for this president’s re-election. That will go a long way.



Comments

  1. redladee says:

    Re: “Republicans used to understand this very well as evidenced by George W. Bush’s savvy outreach to Hispanics. He knew that for Latinos, familiarity is key.”

    The difference is that he actually was familiar with Mexican-Americans because of his Texas background, and his nephew and sister-in-law. Furthermore, Bush had to rely on gimmicks like “familiarity” because he couldn’t win our votes by running on the issues. I hope that’s not the equivalent you were drawing between Obama and Bush.

    If this conversation had been issue oriented, it would have been successful, but you seem to confuse being heard with the image of being heard. Talking to the First Lady about family dinner and oral hygeine is not being heard! It’s patronizing to say the least.This is not 1890.I really didn’t see the First Lady trying to win our votes or make the case for her husband. Instead, we were supposed to be honored that she took time for the chat. I’m glad that she participated, but I have seen video of her online addressing big donors (introductory remarks) and believe me, it’s the other way around; she expresses gratitude to them for hosting her, and she proceeds to make the case for her husband. And they’re not discussing insipid topics like family dinner.

    You saved the policy achievements for the end of your article. They should have been first, and you should have skipped the rest.

    As for Head Start, those programs now have to compete for federal funding, whch means that some of those programs are on the chopping block and will be cut. Los Angeles, for example. I would tell any voter reading this post to research the issues on her own because one cannot believe what pollsters and political operatives say. They think we’re stupid.

  2. redladee says:

    One more thing. Stop putting immigrants in for-profit prisons. I don’t want my tax dollars used to make some prison CEO rich. The federal government needs to cancel all contracts with for-profit prions. How does Obama differ from Romney on that Issue? He doesn’t. On that issue they’re the same. The only difference is their rhetoric.

    Do not vote for ANY candidate who takes money from CEO, GCA, or Management and Training Corp.

    Google “Immigrants Prove Big Business for Prison Companies”

  3. Well the Mamiverse chat certainly won my vote. The intimate armchair-to-armchair atmosphere and casual flow of the chat made the First Lady only the more credible. I believe she has our back as does the President.

Speak Your Mind

*